Conclusions About Historical Accuracy of the Bible by Glenn Smith

This post is mainly about the historical reliability of Luke-Acts.


– The best evidence shows that Luke and Acts were composed by 60 A.D.

– Luke and Acts are so well attested historically and archaeologically that they have more support than any other book in ancient history.

– There is no reasonable way that Luke/Acts could have been written by anyone other than someone living in the region in the first century.

(4 min read; 1,021 words)

Conclusions About Historical Accuracy of the Bible | Thomistic Bent
HT: Greg West at The Poached Egg from Ratio Christi)

This entry was posted in An Ancient Text, Attestation & Corroboration, Dating Texts & Events, Earliest Christianity (30-50 A.D.), Greco-Roman Culture, Historicity, Other Biblical-Era Literature. Bookmark the permalink.